Belarus: illegal weapons supplier?

by Islander on August 11, 2010

Continued from “Iran: Belarus’s Biggest Friend”
Belarus has shown its willingness to cooperate with Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, and Venezuela, just to name a few. Not surprisingly, Belarus has been mentioned by U.S. officials as a country with flagrant human rights violations, a lack of democratic institutions, and suspicious business transactions.
In the mid-1990s, UN inspection teams reported that machine tools sold by Belarus to Iraq were capable of turning out components for missiles. Another UN inspection found machinery believed to be used to make lenses for artillery shells. In July 2001, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Belarus released a statement denying allegations that Belarus sold radars and modernized air defense and communications systems to Iraq. In the same year, arms experts called Belarus “the most secretive country in the business of arms sales,” while the Russian NTV channel publicly reported that President Lukashenka re-sells or serves as an intermediary between Russian arms exporters and countries suspected of sponsoring terrorism.

Recently, there was another article on this subject published by “Novaya Gazetta.”

In 2002, Jane’s Intelligence Digest reported Belarus secretly supplied arms to Chechen rebels through Georgia and Turkey. In November 2003, the U.S. ambassador in Belarus, Michael Kozak, stated that Belarus not only supplied arms to Iraq but also trained Iraqi military personnel to use air-defense systems. In June 2003, Lebanese customs officials stopped a military cargo shipment that was thought to have been shipped from Belarus with a destination of Iraq.
It is important to note that unlike Ukraine, which acknowledged sale of arms to China and Iran, Belarus has not admitted participation in illegal arms transfers.

Not surprising since Alexander Lukashenka is trying to balance his position between Russia and Western Europe.

However, an analysis of diplomatic contacts, business transactions and media reports indicates a very strong possibility that Belarus uses its contacts with African and Middle Eastern countries to secretly sell or transport arms.
First, as a Soviet republic, Belarus was known for its industrial plants and technical capabilities. It is a well-known fact that the Minsk Factory of Wheeled Tractors is more than capable of making military machines and tools. Notable is the fact that this factory was mentioned as a possible supplier of tractors to Iraq, Iran, and Sudan.

Dragunov rifle

Dragunov rifle

Belarus has a reputation as a manufacturer of high-end military optical products, including optic scopes for AK-47s and Dragunov sniper rifles. In 2009, according to the official statistics, Belarus sold to Venezuela 2,141 “binoculars, monoculars and other optical instruments” with an estimated value of $8 million. For comparison, export of similar items to the United States was estimated to be around $1.9 million. Furthermore, Belarusian military analyst Alexander Alesin thinks that Western experts badly underestimate Belarusian arms exports because Belarus switched from the export of conventional weapons such as tanks and jet fighters to high-tech and dual-use (concealed) military equipment and tools.

Sure, it could be that Venezuela needs thousands of what was described only as “optical products.” It is just the numbers look extremely high compared to similar exports to other countries (not to mention that there are not many exports of that kind.)

Vanuatu

Vanuatu

Secondly, Belarus has been actively seeking partnerships with countries providing offshore financial services or implicated in lax anti-money laundering practices. For example, in November 2003, President Lukashenka signed a decree establishing diplomatic relations between Republic of Botswana and the Republic of Vanuatu. Incidentally, Vanuatu was known as a “tax heaven” that until 2008 did not release account information to other governments or law-enforcement agencies. In 2008, Abu Dhabi-based Al Maabar International Investments announced that it considered real estate investments in Morocco, Libya, Tunisia, Qatar, Belarus and Jordan. In 2009–2010, Belarusian authorities agreed to register two Iranian banks, “Onerbank” and “Trading Capital Bank.”

Private banks in the country with what is basically centrally planned economy?

Third, Belarus was mentioned by media and industry experts as a middleman between Russia and potential arms buyers. In 2007, Ivan Safronov, a journalist working for the Russian newspaper Kommersant, visited Abu Dhabi to provide news coverage of IDEX 2007, the largest arms exhibitions in the Middle East. Upon his return, he told his colleagues that he obtained information about possible sales of jet fighters and anti-aircraft systems by Russia to Iran and Syria. According to Safronov, Russia intended to use Belarus to cover up its own involvement in the potential deal. A couple days later, Ivan Safronov committed suicide.

Recently, charter97.org published an article where these allegations are brought up again.

Combined, these factors might indicate that Belarus is an active and willing exporter of arms. Belarus has technical capabilities and financial incentives to participate in arms transfer with countries implicated in sponsoring terrorism. Most importantly, President Lukashenka has clearly demonstrated his willingness to deal with Iran, Syria and Sudan. His political record shows that he is unlikely to fully adopt democratic reforms and follow Western legal norms. At the same time, he expressed his desire to work with Western countries in exchange for certain concessions such as bank credits. Thus, it is possible that in order to balance between the Western and Eastern interests, Belarus’ business transactions with the anti-democratic regimes will get even more secretive in the future.

{ 0 comments }

Belarus: Good Friends with Iran

by Islander on August 5, 2010

The Islamic Republic of Iran became the next big friend of Belarus after Saddam Hussein’s regime fell in 2003. Iranian and Belarusian officials had met before the second Iraq war: In June 2002, while meeting with the chair of the Iranian Parliament, Mehdi Karroubi, the chair of the Belarus National Assembly, Alexander Voitovich, said, “Belarus shares and understands foreign policy initiatives advocated by the Islamic Republic of Iran.” However, following the fall of Saddam’s Iraq, Belarusian-Iranian relations in economic, diplomatic, and military areas rapidly took off.

ahmadinejad

ahmadinejad

In August 2003, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Iraq sent a note notifying Belarusian officials that the Iraqi diplomatic mission in Belarus would be closed. A month later, the Iranian embassy and more than 20 Iranian companies organized a trade expo in Minsk, Belarus. It was announced that a joint Belarusian-Iranian venture named BDC intended to build a modern complex in Brest, a Belarusian city at the border with Poland. Another Iranian firm, Kayson, considered bidding on the construction of an underground shopping center in Minsk.

What caused an uptick in business relations between these countries?

From that point on, both countries started exchanging multiple official visits and making promising statements. Belarus visited Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs Kamal Kharrazi (2004), Iranian President Mohammad Khatami (2004), Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Mekhdi Safari (2005), Minister of Trade Massoud Mir Kazemi (2006), Minister of Industry and Mines Alireza Tahmasebi (2006) and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (2007), just to name the few.

In addition, Belarusian officials quite actively visited Iran, where they met with various Iranian officials: Belarusian Ambassador in Iran Leonid Rachkov met with the Deputy Minister of Science, Research and Technology of Iran Jaffar Ali Monfared (2004), Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei Martynov visited Iran in 2006, President Lukashenka visited Iran in 2006, and Minister of Defense Leonid Maltcev met with high-level Iranian military officials in 2007.

At the same time, there was a noticeable uptick in economic and business relations. Just as with Saddam’s government, Iranian officials expressed an intention to build an assembly line of Belarus tractors in Iran. In December 2005, both countries agreed to build an assembly plant for “Samand” Iranian passenger cars near Minsk. Iranian company “Keyson” and the Administration of Free Economic Zone Minsk came to an agreement to build a transport-service complex Prilesje on its territory (2006), the Belarus Auto Plant, and agreed to supply Iran with heavy-duty trucks (2006). Iran announced its intention to open banks with Iranian capital (2007), while Belarus signed an agreement with Iran to develop a Juffair oil field.

Here we come again: Iran is talking about the tractors …Sure, Belarusian tractors have a good reputation, but they are often mentioned in one breath with countries such as Iraq, Iran, Sudan…The countries known for human rights violations and links with terrorist groups.

To be continued

{ 1 comment }

President Lukashenka: “Trade volume with Zambia is unprecedentedly low.”

August 1, 2010

Belarus, located in the heart of Europe, was becoming increasingly interested in economic and diplomatic cooperation with various African states. What went largely unreported by media and official statements was the fact that many of the above mentioned potential trade partners had lax anti-money laundering laws.

Read the full article →

Belarus: Befriending the Axis of Terror

July 30, 2010

Since early 1990s, the Belarusian government actively has been establishing diplomatic, military, and economic relationships with foreign countries. Interestingly, although Belarus is located in the heart of Europe, it has shown special attention to African and Middle Eastern countries. Specifically, the Belarusian government has focused development of its diplomatic, military, and economic efforts on Iraq, [...]

Read the full article →

Tying three models together

July 20, 2010

The Model I, II, and III are different in type of questions they pose, perspectives, approaches and possible outcomes. However different though, together they provide a fuller picture because upon a closer look they could be logically linked together. Model I shows that Belarus is strategically positioned to take advantage of its status as a [...]

Read the full article →

How do energy politics impact national sovereignty of Belarus? Model III

July 15, 2010

Model III questions: Model III looks and analyzes individuals and attempts to predict outcomes or possible course of action based on this analysis. a) Whose opinion and views really count in making a particular economic or political decision? Considering that incumbent Belarusian President remains in power for 14 years (as of 2008), it should be [...]

Read the full article →

How do energy politics impact national sovereignty of Belarus? Model II

July 8, 2010

Model II questions: While Model I focuses more on a broader picture, Model II attempts to look at organizational traits that shape and produce opinions, perceptions and courses of action. a) What organization/factor plays the biggest role in Belarus? It appears to be the Soviet Union. Certainly Soviet Union does not exist, yet its legacy [...]

Read the full article →

How do energy politics impact national sovereignty of Belarus? Model I

June 29, 2010

In an attempt to create a complete picture with circumstances, factors and motives that underline Belarus’ energy policies and create grounds for future developments, this discussion will adopt and follow three conceptual models and corresponding questions presented and developed by Graham Allison and Philip Zelikow (1999) in their book “Essence of Decision. Explaining the Cuban [...]

Read the full article →

How do energy politics impact national sovereignty of Belarus? Soviet Success

June 11, 2010

Being Anchored by the Image of Soviet Success In the atmosphere of general chaos that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union and suffering from distorted trade links and unsecured currency, the image of Belarus as one of the most stable and successful republic saw a blowing crash. Unable to get public support for painful [...]

Read the full article →

How do energy politics impact national sovereignty of Belarus? 1990′s

June 3, 2010

1990′s: Where Do You Go From Here? In 1991 Russia, Ukraine and Belarus signed a document that effectively dissolved the Soviet Union and paved the way for its former members towards full independence. On the eve of such grandiose historical event Belarus was rather a successful republic with very high living standards compared to most [...]

Read the full article →