<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;1984&#8243; might get a sequel titled &#8220;2005&#8243;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wrongways.com/1984-might-get-a-sequel-titled-2005/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wrongways.com/1984-might-get-a-sequel-titled-2005</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Literary Critic</title>
		<link>http://www.wrongways.com/1984-might-get-a-sequel-titled-2005#comment-69661</link>
		<dc:creator>The Literary Critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 04:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrongways.com/?p=39#comment-69661</guid>
		<description>To me, &lt;a href="http://theliterarycritic.blogspot.com/2008/05/big-brother-is-watching-you_09.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;1984&lt;/a&gt; isn’t fiction – it’s a warning. The threat of political manipulation is always present, as long as the innate desire for power exists in man. We might be past 1984, but I’m not really quite sure we’re safe yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, <a href="http://theliterarycritic.blogspot.com/2008/05/big-brother-is-watching-you_09.html" rel="nofollow">1984</a> isn’t fiction – it’s a warning. The threat of political manipulation is always present, as long as the innate desire for power exists in man. We might be past 1984, but I’m not really quite sure we’re safe yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.wrongways.com/1984-might-get-a-sequel-titled-2005#comment-21430</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrongways.com/?p=39#comment-21430</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, I can see that the wireless taps performed on 500 with known terrorist connections completely equates to the world presented in 1984.  In reality, the objections to this practice raised by those opposed to the ongoing war can more realistically be explained as doublethink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, I can see that the wireless taps performed on 500 with known terrorist connections completely equates to the world presented in 1984.  In reality, the objections to this practice raised by those opposed to the ongoing war can more realistically be explained as doublethink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xela</title>
		<link>http://www.wrongways.com/1984-might-get-a-sequel-titled-2005#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>xela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wrongways.com/?p=39#comment-22</guid>
		<description>More likely it will get sequel named '2006'... but you're right. 
The worst effect of this that it doesn't guarantee anything. Even so NSA is doing, there always be threat. Agency is just fighting against the manifestation of the terrorism, not against it cause or root... How one can expect solving the problem without taking care of the reasons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More likely it will get sequel named &#8216;2006&#8242;&#8230; but you&#8217;re right.<br />
The worst effect of this that it doesn&#8217;t guarantee anything. Even so NSA is doing, there always be threat. Agency is just fighting against the manifestation of the terrorism, not against it cause or root&#8230; How one can expect solving the problem without taking care of the reasons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
